Research Data Repositories
It is inevitable these days that researchers depend heavily on various kinds and sources of data. Researches usually start from one or more sources of input data, and some generate datasets that are contributed as open data, available to the public upon the publication of papers. In some cases, these open data may be in multiple versions as data being updated, or new data is added. Customisable access control may be a requirement if the research data is part of the peer-review process as the research paper. Thus, it is critical when choosing a data repository, we evaluate it against our use case and data management workflow and requirements.
While searching for a data repository solution for our projects, we find the information regarding research data repositories and open data repositories are scattered over the internet. We decided to compile a list of repositories that we found relevant to our field, perform a comparison among them.
In general, there are four categories of research data repository options:
- data repositories associated with academic institutes,
- generic open data repositories,
- open data registry backed by private companies, and
There is an endless list of options for each of these categories, we have selected a few major ones in each to compare and contrast. The comparison is performed based on the following aspects that are important to us:
- supported file format
- file size limitation
- total storage space limitation
- version control
- access control
- data license requirements
Academic Data Repositories
These repositories are usually set up within an academic institute to host the research publications and/or research data of research labs in the institute. While such systems are set up within the institute, some, like Dataverse at Harvard University and ICPSR at the University of Michigan, are open to host publications and data contributed by researchers from other academic institutes.
Here we compare ScholarBank@NUS, Dataverse@Harvard and ICPSR@UMich.
General Research Data Repositories
Other than the academic research repositories, there other types of general research data repositories. These are generally partnered with publishers, associated with government sectors, or backed by non-profits organisations.
In comparison to the academic institute backed research repositories, most of these repositories could offer free data deposition/maintenance services, while some take donations, or offer membership/subscription for higher allowance of storage. Below is the comparison between FigShare, Dryad, Zenodo, Open Science Framework (OSF), Pangeae and Mendeley Data.
Open Data Repositories backed by private companies
Many private companies have also showed support in the Open Data Initiative and offer hosting and registry of various open data. The terms and conditions for these data repositories are not usually publicly accessible, and need to be negotiated with the company who backed them respectively.
Here are the options we looked into open data solution offered by Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft.
Lastly, there is always the option to self-host the research data. This option may offer more flexibility, freedom and ease to update the dataset as we wish, but it requires the development and maintenance of a data access portal, and technical maintenance of a web server, in addition to research data management. Depending on the simplicity of the data access portal, advanced features such as download statistics, version control and user access module could require effort to implement.
Although this list is not complete with all the research data repositories available, we hope this provides enough viable options for our future research and those who are looking for open data repository solutions. We also welcome other suggestions that we may have overlooked.
For those who are interested, the comparison matrix can be found in a google sheet here.